New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Please dual-license #31
Comments
That sounds good to me! @stasm ? |
I see three contributors to the repo: |
Sounds good to me 👍 |
I'm personally fine with dual-licensing, but we should check with the Licensing Team. My understanding is that it should be OK. I filed bug 1408992 to make sure. |
We've got a green light. I submitted #34. |
Thanks, everyone. We are officially dual-licensed now. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
The gold standard for Rust projects is to dual license them under the Apache license and MIT. Most Rust crates are licensed that way. The Apache license gives users better patent protection, while the MIT is compatible to (L)GPL version 2 only projects. It would be nice if you would switch the license to dual license. The earlier the easier it is :).
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: