You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Description: The current diff API brings the differences in all content keys between the two perimeters. The request is to allows a filter that restricts the search operation for a specific ContentKey.
The DBAdapter implementation is already equipped to take KeyFilterPredicate parameter. So, the ask to expose the same at upper layers (version store / APIs etc).
Requested Changes in public API: Extend diff API to support filter options on the content key
Changes in REST API
Changes in Java Client API
Changes in Python Client API
Changes in SQL extentions
Expected Use Cases: Skip compaction on unchanged tables
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This is a general enhancement (applies to API v1 as well as to v2), so I'm moving it out of the scope of #5112, which contains only the tasks required to achieve a releasable API v2 covering existing v1 functionality (where possible).
Description: The current diff API brings the differences in all content keys between the two perimeters. The request is to allows a filter that restricts the search operation for a specific ContentKey.
The DBAdapter implementation is already equipped to take KeyFilterPredicate parameter. So, the ask to expose the same at upper layers (version store / APIs etc).
Requested Changes in public API: Extend diff API to support filter options on the content key
Expected Use Cases: Skip compaction on unchanged tables
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: