Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

change: consider nil optional to be false for additional configs #5985

Merged

Conversation

simonpasquier
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Additional scrape, Alertmanager and alert relabeling configurations which are references to secret keys can be declared as optional. If the optional bool pointer is nil, the operator should consider that the reference isn't optional. It used to be the case before #5720 but the logic was inverted by accident.

Type of change

What type of changes does your code introduce to the Prometheus operator? Put an x in the box that apply.

  • CHANGE (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • FEATURE (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • BUGFIX (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • ENHANCEMENT (non-breaking change which improves existing functionality)
  • NONE (if none of the other choices apply. Example, tooling, build system, CI, docs, etc.)

Changelog entry

Please put a one-line changelog entry below. This will be copied to the changelog file during the release process.

consider nil optional to be false for additional configs

Additional scrape, Alertmanager and alert relabeling configurations
which are references to secret keys can be declared as optional. If the
optional bool pointer is nil, the operator should consider that the
reference isn't optional. It used to be the case before prometheus-operator#5720 but the
logic was inverted by accident.

Signed-off-by: Simon Pasquier <spasquie@redhat.com>
@simonpasquier simonpasquier merged commit 982537b into prometheus-operator:main Oct 10, 2023
17 checks passed
@simonpasquier simonpasquier deleted the simplify-secret-key-refs branch October 10, 2023 14:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants