New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Backward incompatibility of 0.17.0 #266
Comments
To promise backwards compatibility we would have to release 1.0 |
Magnolia has become a widely used library. The thing is that in a relatively small project it comes as a transitive dependency from 4 different libs. If only one lib updates magnolia to 0.17.0, and the others don't come up with new releases, the whole app may be spoilt silently (will break at runtime). That's what really happened. It doesn't cost much to support backward compatibility when you add a new argument such as an array of annotations. |
Thanks for reporting, @catostrophe. I want to move to version 1.0 quite soon now, though it does need a bit of admin work, which I haven't had time for. |
#247 can actually be binary compatible, as the methods aren't part of any binary API. But in any case, I would support |
#257 has broken the backward compatibility of
magnolia
.When I bumped version, I got a runtime error in a lib dependent on 0.16.0:
The newly added param should have been with the default value.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: