New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
New Release? #176
Comments
Thanks for the prompt. @TheGeorge : do we have any pending changes to the manual / docs for the targeted stuff before I press the button for a 1.3.0 release? |
From my side you can go ahead and make a new release. |
I've created a new 1.3.0 release (https://github.com/proper-testing/proper/releases). PS. In the middle of vacations, hence the delay this period. |
The release seems good to me. As for Hex.pm, there's usually someone who's owner of the lib on there, considering that they have published it already. It appears @tsharju has current control of it. He could likely publish the new package for you, or hand control over to you. If you want control directly, you usually would have to write to support@hex.pm and they'll do some check for the ownership of the repo before transfering the rights. To publish a package, there are a few changes to the .app file required. The documentation explaining it all is at https://hex.pm/docs/rebar3_publish -- just remember to have an up to date plugin and rebar3 to avoid most possible problems. |
FYI I've been using f2b7b81 (commit of latest tag) for a while with no issue. |
@getong see my post just above yours regarding the blocker |
Oh, I am sorry. I have send @tsharju a email, I think there will be a good news. |
Still no news from that packaging point of view. @kostis Would you like me to start asking the Hex folks for control of this repo for you, or would you be okay if someone in this issue took ownership of hex publication on your behalf? |
It is better to take control of this, and how can do it? Like the poolboy , the new tag is made very days ago, but not pushed to hex.pm, just because not privilege granted. |
I do not mind either way and, as I wrote above, any help / outsourcing of such tasks is appreciated. @tsharju : if you read this, is it possible to push PropEr 1.3 into Hex.pm site and/or transfer the ownership? |
I can definitely assist with the transfer. I’m not working with Elixir/Erlang atm so I’m not probably the right person to keep the package up-to-date. |
@tsharju I'm willing to take the ownership for now since Kostis seems to be okay with it. I'll do the initial set-up readding the missing files and submitting PRs; then things will be in place for an eventual additional handover. My hex user is https://hex.pm/users/ferd |
@ferd I added you as owner. Let me know if it worked. You can remove me from owners. I left myself there in case the transfer didn't work. |
I do have an email telling me everything is in place; I'll try getting the rest of the whole thing set up tonight. |
Alright, I published the new packcage. I'll close the issue. |
Hi,
I know I've asked for this a lot over the last few months, but I'm wondering when could we be expecting a new release (and a bump on the hex package as well)?
Since the last release (1.2.0) which was released in June 2016 (!!) it appears that the following improvements have been made to name a few:
?SETUP
macroI don't like being pushy, but I'd really like to be able to refer people to the hex package while being able to support all these improvements, or at the very least having a tag to avoid just telling them to "point it to master" or some specific hash.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: