We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
I downloaded your pre-trained model named "model18_lr" from: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Z60MI_UdTHfoSFSFwLI39yfe8njEN6Kp/view?usp=sharing .
I saved the estimated disparity map by your script:
python main.py --val --data_path --resume /model18_192x640.pth.tar --use_full_scale --post_process --output_scale 0 --disps_path
The result is: Mono evaluation - using median scaling Scaling ratios | med: 6.675 | std: 0.085
abs_rel | sq_rel | rmse | rmse_log | a1 | a2 | a3 | & 0.169 & 0.981 & 5.269 & 0.241 & 0.745 & 0.943 & 0.978 \
It is not good. Is there anything I have missed? Thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Our model is stereo. If you use monodepth2's script, you should probably use eval_stereo instead of eval_mono.
stereo
eval_stereo
eval_mono
Sorry, something went wrong.
We tested model18.pth.tar, the result seems OK. Perhaps there is something wrong with the model model18_192x640.pth.tar.
No branches or pull requests
I downloaded your pre-trained model named "model18_lr" from: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Z60MI_UdTHfoSFSFwLI39yfe8njEN6Kp/view?usp=sharing .
I saved the estimated disparity map by your script:
python main.py
--val --data_path --resume /model18_192x640.pth.tar
--use_full_scale --post_process --output_scale 0 --disps_path
( https://github.com/nianticlabs/monodepth2/blob/master/evaluate_depth.py ).
The command is: python evaluate_depth.py --data_path <dataset_dir> --eval_mono --ext_disp_to_eval <saved_depth_map> --post_process.
The result is:
Mono evaluation - using median scaling
Scaling ratios | med: 6.675 | std: 0.085
abs_rel | sq_rel | rmse | rmse_log | a1 | a2 | a3 |
& 0.169 & 0.981 & 5.269 & 0.241 & 0.745 & 0.943 & 0.978 \
It is not good. Is there anything I have missed?
Thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: