Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Traces too close to Calibration points #3

Closed
CacikeOtoao opened this issue Apr 6, 2018 · 12 comments
Closed

Traces too close to Calibration points #3

CacikeOtoao opened this issue Apr 6, 2018 · 12 comments

Comments

@CacikeOtoao
Copy link

CacikeOtoao commented Apr 6, 2018

As seen on mk-52 12volt beds the copper traces were too close to the calibration points causing the PINDA to not find the reference points and failing calibration, therefore retracing was needed. Please update files to reflect these changes to the community.

@CacikeOtoao CacikeOtoao changed the title Traces to close to Calibration points Traces too close to Calibration points Apr 6, 2018
@zbrozek
Copy link

zbrozek commented Jul 21, 2018

The third probe point in particular is prone to calibration failure. It's also the only probe point that's got a continuous copper ocean completely around it.

Here's the worst point:
image

Here's the best point:
image

@gregsaun
Copy link

I have received the first version of MK2.5 heated bed and 3 points have been cut out :

1st bed point 1:
1stbed_point1

1st bed point 2:
1stbed_point2

1st bed point 3:
1stbed_point3

1st bed point 4:
1stbed_point4

My first bed was twisted and could never have a good first layer across the bed. Prusa sent my a new one and this one does not have cuts :

2nd bed point 1:
2nd_bed_point1

2nd bed point 2:
2nd_bed_point2

2nd bed point 3:
2nd_bed_point3

2nd bed point 4:
2nd_bed_point4

Does this mean some files are missing or not synchronized anymore?

@gregsaun
Copy link

This could explain these issues as well :

prusa3d/Prusa-Firmware#895
prusa3d/Prusa-Firmware#764
prusa3d/Prusa-Firmware#616

@zbrozek
Copy link

zbrozek commented Jul 22, 2018

I used a razor blade to create some clearance from the third probe point to the trace immediately to the right. Then calibration worked on the first try.
image

@matthew-humphrey
Copy link

Good work troubleshooting this guys. Up-voting to hopefully draw a response from Prusa.

@ok1hra
Copy link
Member

ok1hra commented Jul 24, 2018

This problem was solved in firmware MK2.5 (3.1.4-RC1) and later also MK3 and MK2.5 (3.2.0-RC1).
Therefore was no need changed Heatbed layout.

@ok1hra ok1hra closed this as completed Jul 24, 2018
@zbrozek
Copy link

zbrozek commented Jul 24, 2018

I was completely unable to complete a calibration with my brand-new mk52 12v bed with firmwares 3.1.3, 3.1.4, 3.2.0, 3.3.0, and 3.3.1 until I cut away the small section to the right of the probe point.

I do not believe that any firmware solution is possible. It is possible to traverse X at the highest Z at which a perfectly-centered PINDA just triggers and not have the PINDA output go high until it's past the edge of the board.

@zbrozek
Copy link

zbrozek commented Jul 25, 2018

Here's a log from firmware 3.3.1 failing XYZ calibration on a stock 12v mk52 bed. Notice the bad 2D scan of point three after a false trigger during the initial spiraling search. This problem is not fixed.

fw_3.3.1_xyz.log

@CacikeOtoao
Copy link
Author

CacikeOtoao commented Jul 25, 2018

@ok1hra So a design flaw gets compensated for in Firmware and doesn't get an actual fix. They are surely flexing the OSHW licensing. So the bed designed as it is will be unusable outside of the Official Prusa Firmware.

@zbrozek
Copy link

zbrozek commented Jul 25, 2018

I don't think there's any issue with following the license or the spirit of it. But I do think that the bug isn't closed because no hardware fix is in place, and the firmware fix doesn't actually work. This is a negative-margin design and a minor tweak can fix it.

@sirBlargh
Copy link

Did my upgrade 6 days ago. It also failed at point 3 so I Talked with support. First they suggested that I should adjust PINDA but that did not help. They then asked me to verify that it was 100mm from the back of the Z-frame to the closest part of the back feet. I had 101mm and changing that to 100mm solved it for me.

@zbrozek
Copy link

zbrozek commented Jul 26, 2018

Yeah, over chat I was told to make sure that the PINDA was landing precisely in the center of the silkscreen circle. It wasn't, but I adjusted until it was. No change on point three. After I did my modifications and checked the calibration, it looked like my positional error was <0.2 mm in both X and Y. I would hope that calibration is tolerant to such small errors.

So I bought three more probes of various kinds. Only one was able to differentiate the probe point from the surrounding traces. It was an Omron unit; I can dig up the exact part number if anyone is interested.

I debated between installing that probe permanently, but decided that I would rather stick with more-stock hardware. The internal temperature sensor on the PINDA swayed me. Though I don't know how consistent the Omron part is over temperature. I supposed I should find out.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants