You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As my previous feature request stated, I'm printing lots of PACF with 4 or more perimeter, and the size of small holes became off.
So I was forced to use OrcaSlicer to take adventage of this feature from it, but it's not as friendly to use as our native PrusaSlicer, and also a bit buggy with path generation.
But the feature does work and the option inner/outer/inner gave me not only good dimantional accrucy but also good surface finish, rather then the only option in PS (External perimeter first) gave me bad surface finish.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
As my previous feature request stated, I'm printing lots of PACF with 4 or more perimeter, and the size of small holes became off.
So I was forced to use OrcaSlicer to take adventage of this feature from it, but it's not as friendly to use as our native PrusaSlicer, and also a bit buggy with path generation.
But the feature does work and the option inner/outer/inner gave me not only good dimantional accrucy but also good surface finish, rather then the only option in PS (External perimeter first) gave me bad surface finish.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: