Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Marking safe areas for sequential printing #4195

Closed
pedjas opened this issue May 5, 2020 · 4 comments
Closed

Marking safe areas for sequential printing #4195

pedjas opened this issue May 5, 2020 · 4 comments

Comments

@pedjas
Copy link

pedjas commented May 5, 2020

Version

2.2.0

Operating system type + version

Not relevant

3D printer brand / version + firmware version (if known)

Not relevant

Behavior

When sequential printig is turned on PrusaSlicer warns user if objects are to close for extruder to pass them safely. That is good.

But there is no visal indication what is safe distance around objects. User has to guess. this leads to non optimal space usage.

This a new feature request.

It would be good to have option to display safe area around each object. That would help user see where exactly objects may be located for optimal space usage and overall printing speed.

Project File (.3MF) where problem occurs

Irellevant

@foreachthing
Copy link

foreachthing commented May 5, 2020

No, arrage should work with the correct offset. That would make much more sense.
#4016

@pedjas
Copy link
Author

pedjas commented May 26, 2020

Sure, arrange is expected to set correct offset. But, if user arranges objects by himself interface lacks of indication what is safe distance.

@ulab
Copy link

ulab commented Mar 1, 2021

This should also be shown for the multi-material wipe tower in case you are using the "no sparse layers" feature.

@rtyr
Copy link
Collaborator

rtyr commented Aug 12, 2021

Implemented. It will be included in the upcoming PrusaSlicer 2.4.0-alpha1. Closing.

seq1
seq2

@rtyr rtyr closed this as completed Aug 12, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants