New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bridging direction is poorly chosen #7147
Comments
Possibly related to #7103 - if that one worked I may not have noticed the loops with the bridging running this way, although running lengthways between solid pillars would still be a better solution overall. |
Hi there - I just came across this problem when slicing this model. Resulted in some of the bridges running in the correct orientation (across the gap) and some perpendicular to it. As a result, the bridges sag for the first layer. Here's the slicing result from win 2.4.0: The same file, sliced in the current SuperSlicer release: Thanks |
Thanks, your second image is exactly the way I think it should be done. |
Nothing new? The first report of this issue is from october 2021. So, a bump for this. |
Version
Version 2.4.0-alpha3+win64
Operating system type + version
Win 10 x64
3D printer brand / version + firmware version (if known)
Prusa i3 mk3s
Behavior
When sliced the 0.4mm version of the calibration cube https://www.prusaprinters.org/prints/69934-helix-test-cube-filament-sample-xyz-calibration has two identical runs of bridging but on different axes, above the 'X' and 'Y letters. On the X side the bridging is perfect, on the Y side it does two lengthwise runs either side then tries to bridge sideways between them which fails with lots of loops hanging underneath. The bridging should run between the corner pillars in both directions.
Project File (.3MF) where problem occurs
04HelixTestCube.zip
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: