Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Randomizing perimeter line start/end position within the same layer #7225

Open
laukejas opened this issue Nov 1, 2021 · 2 comments
Open

Comments

@laukejas
Copy link

laukejas commented Nov 1, 2021

Version

Version 2.3.3+win64

Operating system type + version

Windows 10 x64

3D printer brand / version + firmware version (if known)

Prusa Mk3S (irrelevant)

Behavior

Currently, PrusaSlicer does not allow to randomize the seam position in the same layer, meaning that with most prints, every perimeter line starts and ends at the same location, and these "gaps" line up. This causes a lot of issues when trying to produce a watertight print, because this gap provides a straight path for the water to get to the inside of the model.

image

It would be great if there was an option in the slicer settings to randomize the position of the start and end of each perimeter line, so they don't line up like this. It would greatly increase the watertightness of the 3D prints.

Project File (.3MF) where problem occurs

pressure test_Default.zip

@rtyr
Copy link
Collaborator

rtyr commented Nov 2, 2021

You may try PrusaSlicer 2.4.0-beta1, where the seams between the nested perimeters are not aligned exactly, but they are staggered by a short distance to reduce bulge of the outer most seam.

https://github.com/prusa3d/PrusaSlicer/releases/tag/version_2.4.0-beta1

seamsbeta

@vincele
Copy link

vincele commented Mar 4, 2022

This looks like a good first step. I'd go even further and ask for "maximized distance between adjacent perimeters". For water tightness, adjacent may also be on the Z axis.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants