Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

First layer temperature set to other layer temperature at beginning of print. #9263

Closed
2 tasks done
Merlin246 opened this issue Dec 9, 2022 · 4 comments
Closed
2 tasks done
Labels

Comments

@Merlin246
Copy link

Description of the bug

Problem: the "other layer" temperature is being used for the first layer instead of first_layer_temperature.

Cause: extra gcode after custom start gcode causing the temperature to be set to "other layer" temperature instead of first_layer_temperature. See attached "GCODE.pdf", the highlighted line is causing the issue.

Misc: Running RepRap Firmware 3.4.3 on Duet 2 Wifi with Duex Expansion Board.

Project file & How to reproduce

Issue.zip
GCODE.pdf

Checklist of files included above

  • Project file
  • Screenshot

Version of PrusaSlicer

2.5.0+win64

Operating system

Windows 11

Printer model

E3D Toolchanger w Revo-Volcano-N/A-N/A

@DragonFinlay
Copy link

I see the issue. The problematic G10 g-code is not part of the Slicer custom g-codes, but rather emitted by the printer profile (toolchanger), and it seems to think it's not in the first layer anymore.
It's difficult for me to reproduce without having an E3D Toolchanger though. I'll see if there's anything we can do.

@Merlin246
Copy link
Author

I see the issue. The problematic G10 g-code is not part of the Slicer custom g-codes, but rather emitted by the printer profile (toolchanger), and it seems to think it's not in the first layer anymore. It's difficult for me to reproduce without having an E3D Toolchanger though. I'll see if there's anything we can do.

Let me know if there is anything I can do to help (sharing the config, testing, etc). Would love to help get to the bottom of this!

Would it be easier to use an alternative to G10 in my custom startcode? Something like the M568 gcode (M104 doesn't allow separate active & standby temperatures).

@kubispe1
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi, in this case, PS Ooze prevention caused this issue. So the solution is to disable Ooze prevention.
After that there is a G-Code preview bug, that was already fixed in 2.6.0. G-Code itself should be fine.
So, I see this:
image

@kubispe1
Copy link
Collaborator

kubispe1 commented Feb 1, 2023

I am closing this issue as solved with new alpha: 2.6.0-alpha2

@kubispe1 kubispe1 closed this as completed Feb 1, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants