New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Gyroid infill with, it´s impossible to change ... #1131
Comments
Yeah, it's because it's using "bridge" flow in slic3rPE. One quick solution if it's problematic for you:
Note: it should be the same for the 3D honeycomb. |
The issue here is, the gyroid infill as of now is printed with a bridging
flow, so it does not respect the infill extrusion line width.
…On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 10:37 AM, Merill ***@***.***> wrote:
How do you "change the width" ? with the parameter in advanced->infill?
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#1131 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFj5I6qtuGQroi5Sp6S4pEvdhpiosU0wks5uO_TlgaJpZM4V0MKH>
.
|
The "Combine infill every:" option also seems to cause problems with gyroid infill if it's set to something other than 1. |
Wasn't this your initial implementation? Does the non-bridging flow produce sufficient overlaps? |
Yes, it was in my initial implementation, as I used 3DHoneycomb as a baseline.
Yes. (line section result below are with 0.9 bridging reduction & 0.4 line width) Imho, you should also remove the bridge_flow from 3D honeycomb. note: I wanted to use the dont_connect to let user say "don't connect the lines, i want to create an art piece" but I have to create a new gui button for that. I think i will clean the fill api & create some more gui option for it in the future. |
The bridging flow was disabled for Gyroid infill with b429b39 |
Version
1.41.0 Beta+
Operating system type + version
Mac OS 10.13.6
Behavior
thx, best Udo
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: