Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implement voluntary exits pool #4610

Merged
merged 4 commits into from Jan 21, 2020
Merged

Implement voluntary exits pool #4610

merged 4 commits into from Jan 21, 2020

Conversation

prestonvanloon
Copy link
Member

Part one of many for #2766.

This PR defines the voluntary exits pool, but does not wire it up to any services. That will come in the next PR.

@prestonvanloon prestonvanloon added the Ready For Review A pull request ready for code review label Jan 21, 2020
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 21, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #4610 into master will decrease coverage by 25.94%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #4610       +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   46.02%   20.08%   -25.95%     
===========================================
  Files         220       51      -169     
  Lines       15078     3670    -11408     
===========================================
- Hits         6940      737     -6203     
+ Misses       7035     2828     -4207     
+ Partials     1103      105      -998

@terencechain terencechain merged commit bfda29f into master Jan 21, 2020
@delete-merged-branch delete-merged-branch bot deleted the voluntary-exits branch January 21, 2020 23:29
cryptomental pushed a commit to cryptomental/prysm that referenced this pull request Feb 24, 2020
cryptomental pushed a commit to cryptomental/prysm that referenced this pull request Feb 28, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Ready For Review A pull request ready for code review
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants