Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove Old Sync Routine #5761

Merged
merged 1 commit into from May 6, 2020
Merged

Remove Old Sync Routine #5761

merged 1 commit into from May 6, 2020

Conversation

nisdas
Copy link
Member

@nisdas nisdas commented May 6, 2020

This PR removes our old sync routine due to the current sync queue method having been the default for a few weeks now without any incident. This also removes a feature flag which disabled the new initial sync method.

@nisdas nisdas requested a review from a team as a code owner May 6, 2020 04:07
@nisdas nisdas added the Ready For Review A pull request ready for code review label May 6, 2020
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 6, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #5761 into master will increase coverage by 50.00%.
The diff coverage is 33.33%.

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #5761       +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    4.56%   54.56%   +50.00%     
===========================================
  Files         241      309       +68     
  Lines       21247    25533     +4286     
===========================================
+ Hits          969    13933    +12964     
+ Misses      20126     9552    -10574     
- Partials      152     2048     +1896     

@prylabs-bulldozer prylabs-bulldozer bot merged commit bf2a37b into master May 6, 2020
@delete-merged-branch delete-merged-branch bot deleted the removeOldSync branch May 6, 2020 04:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Ready For Review A pull request ready for code review
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants