Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We鈥檒l occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add Easy --onyx --witti --altona Flags for Switching Testnets #6342

Closed
rauljordan opened this issue Jun 22, 2020 · 4 comments
Closed

Add Easy --onyx --witti --altona Flags for Switching Testnets #6342

rauljordan opened this issue Jun 22, 2020 · 4 comments
Assignees
Labels
Enhancement New feature or request Priority: Low Low priority item

Comments

@rauljordan
Copy link
Contributor

馃殌 Feature Request

Description

Other clients typically have an easy way to specify what testnet to connect to by default via an easy flag that requires no configuration changes. For example, connecting to Witti would be:

./prysm.sh beacon-chain --witti

and similar for --onyx and --altona. A PR for this would hardcode the required parameters for those testnet versions and make it easy to launch a node this way.

@rauljordan rauljordan added Enhancement New feature or request Priority: Low Low priority item labels Jun 22, 2020
@prestonvanloon prestonvanloon self-assigned this Jun 23, 2020
@prestonvanloon
Copy link
Member

I'll work on this today

@rauljordan
Copy link
Contributor Author

Done by #6380

@prestonvanloon
Copy link
Member

This FR asks for --onyx as well, but was not implemented by #6380. We will need this at some point, especially if new configuration changes merge in eth2-specs (i.e. ethereum/consensus-specs#1894).

I'll reopen this and send a PR for resolution.

@prestonvanloon
Copy link
Member

Actually, we can wait until we decide that Onyx is no longer the default to add --onyx. This would be either a mainnet release (v1.0.0) or Onyx deprecation.

No need to keep this issue open until then.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Enhancement New feature or request Priority: Low Low priority item
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants