Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove Recursive Read Lock in Shared/Rand #7776

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 11, 2020

Conversation

rauljordan
Copy link
Contributor

Follow up to #7770 , the PR introduced a recursive read lock in our rand package. This PR fixes it

@rauljordan rauljordan requested a review from a team as a code owner November 11, 2020 05:37
@rauljordan rauljordan self-assigned this Nov 11, 2020
@rauljordan rauljordan added OK to merge Priority: Critical Highest, immediate priority item Ready For Review A pull request ready for code review labels Nov 11, 2020
@prylabs-bulldozer prylabs-bulldozer bot merged commit 660ed2d into master Nov 11, 2020
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 11, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #7776 (e8a6c21) into master (4290ba4) will increase coverage by 0.03%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #7776      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   62.19%   62.22%   +0.03%     
==========================================
  Files         429      429              
  Lines       30368    30366       -2     
==========================================
+ Hits        18887    18896       +9     
+ Misses       8546     8533      -13     
- Partials     2935     2937       +2     

@delete-merged-branch delete-merged-branch bot deleted the recursive-lock-fix branch November 11, 2020 05:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Priority: Critical Highest, immediate priority item Ready For Review A pull request ready for code review
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants