Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove custom block body root and block root methods #8069

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Dec 9, 2020

Conversation

terencechain
Copy link
Member

What type of PR is this?

Clean up

What does this PR do? Why is it needed?

To eliminate discrepancy of having two different ways to hash root root block body and block. This PR removes our custom BlockRoot and BlockBodyRoot. They were mostly used for tests and benchmarks and migrations. Migration should have used fast ssz instead.

Which issues(s) does this PR fix?

Fixes # N/A

Other notes for review
N/A

@terencechain terencechain requested a review from a team as a code owner December 7, 2020 19:34
@terencechain terencechain self-assigned this Dec 7, 2020
@terencechain terencechain added the Ready For Review A pull request ready for code review label Dec 7, 2020
rauljordan
rauljordan previously approved these changes Dec 7, 2020
nisdas
nisdas previously approved these changes Dec 8, 2020
@nisdas
Copy link
Member

nisdas commented Dec 8, 2020

@terencechain tests fail

@terencechain terencechain dismissed stale reviews from nisdas and rauljordan via dd1da3d December 8, 2020 17:51
@prestonvanloon
Copy link
Member

Fails to build @terencechain

@prestonvanloon prestonvanloon added this to the v1.0.5 milestone Dec 9, 2020
@rauljordan rauljordan merged commit 00dacbd into develop Dec 9, 2020
@delete-merged-branch delete-merged-branch bot deleted the remove-block-root-methods branch December 9, 2020 18:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Ready For Review A pull request ready for code review
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants