Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Files in raw_data/source_data should not be checked #10

Open
lindemann09 opened this issue Oct 1, 2019 · 4 comments
Open

Files in raw_data/source_data should not be checked #10

lindemann09 opened this issue Oct 1, 2019 · 4 comments
Labels
good first issue Good for newcomers help wanted Extra attention is needed spec mismatch
Projects
Toward 0.2.0

Comments

@lindemann09
Copy link

The folder raw_data/source_data contains the data in the original format that is not necessarily Psych DS conform. They can have any format and should therefore not be check by the validator.
@FelixHenninger FelixHenninger added good first issue Good for newcomers help wanted Extra attention is needed spec mismatch labels Oct 1, 2019
@FelixHenninger FelixHenninger added this to Waiting for spec input in Toward 0.2.0 Oct 1, 2019
@FelixHenninger FelixHenninger moved this from Waiting for spec input / clarification to Ready for implementation in Toward 0.2.0 Oct 1, 2019
@FelixHenninger
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks, Oliver, let's see if we can fix this together on Friday!

@mekline
Copy link
Contributor

mekline commented Oct 4, 2019

Can we move this back over to 'waiting on the spec' for a bit? The exact location of data/raw_data etc. is still pending (probably going to decide today, then I'll come back and write a description here, if not implement the tech spec. language.

@lindemann09
Copy link
Author

Yes

@FelixHenninger FelixHenninger moved this from Ready for implementation to Waiting for spec input / clarification in Toward 0.2.0 Oct 19, 2019
@FelixHenninger
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks you two, I've reallocated the issue! Looking forward to the revised spec folder structure.

Cheers, -Felix

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
good first issue Good for newcomers help wanted Extra attention is needed spec mismatch
Projects
Toward 0.2.0
  
Waiting for spec input / clarification
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@lindemann09 @mekline @FelixHenninger