Zoom: more unimplemented Opcodes

[stormchaser3000]

61619|0xffff83f7ca05: Unimplemented Opcode (10) 66 0F 38 09 C1 66 0F 38 09 D3 66 0F 7F 07 66

this is after pulling in and compiling 81b1f61

EDIT: Thank you for all your work on this project. Keep up the good work, but don't overwork yourself :)

[stormchaser3000]

That seems to have solved that error, but now getting this one:

67413|0xffff8e4939be: Unimplemented Opcode (01) 66 44 0F 38 09 C2 66 44 0F 38 09 D2 66 45 0F

with the same window freezing problem

[ptitSeb]

Strange, that's the same opcode I just added.

[stormchaser3000]

it is a different opcode as far as I can tell. many of the hex values are different from the first one

EDIT: Just a sec, I am going to pull in the latest changes and see if it works.

[ptitSeb]

it's the same opcode.
It's "66 0F 38 09"
the 4x between 66 and 0F is the "REX", used to change a few parameters in the opcode, but it's still the same.

To be exact:
66 0F 38 09 C1: psignw xmm0, xmm1
66 44 0F 38 09 C2: psignw xmm8, xmm2

[stormchaser3000]

oh... odd

[stormchaser3000]

ok, an update fixed that one. but now there is this one (which I am actually pretty sure is different).

12825|0xffffac07e16c: Unimplemented Opcode (D3) 0F D7 CA 48 83 E1 0F 83 F1 0F 44 0F BD C1 BA

[ptitSeb]

Yup, this one is different:
0F D7 CA: pmovmskb ecx, mm2

I'll add it soon.

[stormchaser3000]

I can now report that zoom appears to be working like a charm on box64. Both audio and video work and the microphone works as well.

I will not close this issue just yet as I will do some stress testing in a large meeting tonight at some time around 9:30 PM CDT. If I don't encounter any missing opcodes during that meeting I will probably close this issue.

[ptitSeb]

That's very good news! Especialy sound working, as that's still an issue on box86 with the 32bits version!

[Itai-Nelken]

I just tested on commit a5490dc (latest as of writing) on manjaro arm kde plasma running on aa pinebook pro and everything is working other than screen sharing (I'll open a new issue for that).
thanks a lot @ptitSeb!

[stormchaser3000]

it is working quite well for me as well. I went to that meeting and besides the expected high CPU usage, it worked like charm. Thank you @ptitSeb