Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

As a user, I can rsync content to remote servers #1840

Open
pulpbot opened this issue Jan 17, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

As a user, I can rsync content to remote servers #1840

pulpbot opened this issue Jan 17, 2022 · 1 comment
Labels

Comments

@pulpbot
Copy link
Member

pulpbot commented Jan 17, 2022

Author: @bmbouter (bmbouter)

Redmine Issue: 5091, https://pulp.plan.io/issues/5091


Problem

To allow remote storage and serving of Pulp content it would be great if an exporter would rsync content to a remote location.

Design

In Pulp3 an 'exporter' can send content out of a Pulp system. An exporter named RsyncExporter should be created that takes the most important option that rsync accepts. Additionally the RsyncExporter takes either a 'repository' or 'repository_version' but not both. If 'repository' it will publish the latest repository_version.

TBD: which fields specifically?

Implementation

Internally it will write the entire repository to a temporary area on-disk and then shell out to rsync. Other ports of rsync-like functionality to Python I don't believe contain the optimization and stability of rsync itself.

On Demand Content

This feature does not work for on-demand content because the content must be present locally for rsync to ship it to the remote system.

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented May 24, 2022

This issue has been marked 'stale' due to lack of recent activity. If there is no further activity, the issue will be closed in another 30 days. Thank you for your contribution!

@stale stale bot added the stale label May 24, 2022
@dralley dralley removed the stale label May 25, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants