Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Move from secgroup in-line rules to standalone secgroup rules #106

Closed
metral opened this issue Apr 22, 2019 · 0 comments · Fixed by #109
Closed

Move from secgroup in-line rules to standalone secgroup rules #106

metral opened this issue Apr 22, 2019 · 0 comments · Fixed by #109
Assignees
@metral
Labels
kind/enhancement Improvements or new features

Comments

@metral
Copy link
Contributor

metral commented Apr 22, 2019 •
edited
Loading

TF has a long, outstanding bug with the use of in-line rules in secgroups and how they're gathered (hashicorp/terraform-provider-aws#4416), which still exists though the PR suggests otherwise.

TF also states that the conjunction of secgroups with in-line rules and standalone rules do not play well together, and we use both in pulumi/eks.

Moving to standalone secgroup rules is a better approach long-term that we should adopt.

ref: #69
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@metral metral

Labels
kind/enhancement Improvements or new features
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
2 participants
@infin8x @metral