New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Puma randomly failed to start a worker #1572
Comments
Hey, having the same issue here, with the same system configuration except for |
Same here on heroku when dynos are restarted:
EDIT: Related #1438 (comment) which seems fixed in bundler 1.16.x Heroku is still using 15.x and I didn't found any painless method to set |
@kendrikat in your heroku cli run: |
See also #1438 |
hi,
After upgrading from unicorn to puma, i've encounter a strange error;
Sometimes when worker are starting, they start on the bad ruby version, and so causes an error.
This error causes 503 on my application because the worker is not starting properly.
this is my error :
But I a not on ruby 2.5.0
System configuration
Ruby version: 2.5.1
Rails version: 5.1.4
Puma version: 3.11.4
on heroku.
Somebody has an idea ?
After upgrading from unicorn to puma, i've encounter a strange error;
Sometimes when worker are starting, they start on the bad ruby version, and so causes an error. It seems to be random...
This error causes 503 on my application because the worker is not starting properly.
this is my error :
app[web.3]: bundler: failed to load command: puma (/app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.5.0/bin/puma)
app[web.3]: SignalException: SIGTERM
But I a not on ruby 2.5.0
System configuration:
Ruby version: 2.5.1
Rails version: 5.1.4
Puma version: 3.11.4
( on heroku )
Somebody has an idea ?
EDIT :
Procfile :
puma.rb :
Gemfile :
gem 'puma'
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: