Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

PumaCtl invalid option -F #910

Closed
ball-hayden opened this issue Feb 27, 2016 · 5 comments
Closed

PumaCtl invalid option -F #910

ball-hayden opened this issue Feb 27, 2016 · 5 comments

Comments

@ball-hayden
Copy link

Looks like #694 is back again...

Running puma 3.0.2:

[sparkseat@ford current]$ pumactl -F config/puma.rb start
invalid option: -F
@ball-hayden
Copy link
Author

A few trials shows that this regression was introduced in 3.0.0.
2.16.0 is the last version that works.

@irobayna
Copy link

Same issue, looking at pumactl --help still shows -F as a valid option

pumactl (-p PID | -P pidfile | -S status_file | -C url -T token | -F config.rb) (halt|restart|phased-restart|start|stats|status|stop|reload-worker-directory)
    -S, --state PATH                 Where the state file to use is
    -Q, --quiet                      Not display messages
    -P, --pidfile PATH               Pid file
    -p, --pid PID                    Pid
    -C, --control-url URL            The bind url to use for the control server
    -T, --control-token TOKEN        The token to use as authentication for the control server
    -F, --config-file PATH           Puma config script
    -H, --help                       Show this message
    -V, --version                    Show version

@dirknilius
Copy link

Confirmed.

@klippx
Copy link

klippx commented Mar 4, 2016

hear hear +1

Our workaround is to use bundle exec puma -C config/puma.rb

@evanphx evanphx closed this as completed in a8f54f7 Mar 5, 2016
@ball-hayden
Copy link
Author

@evanphx Thanks for fixing that.

Would it be worth adding a test for these arguments?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants