Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Docs: Add reference to pandaSDMX to the pandas Ecosystem page in the API section #9962

Closed
dr-leo opened this issue Apr 21, 2015 · 6 comments · Fixed by #10007
Closed

Docs: Add reference to pandaSDMX to the pandas Ecosystem page in the API section #9962

dr-leo opened this issue Apr 21, 2015 · 6 comments · Fixed by #10007
Labels

Comments

@dr-leo
Copy link
Contributor

dr-leo commented Apr 21, 2015

I would be pleased if pandaSDMx (http://pandasdmx.readthedocs.org) could be added to the pandas Ecosystem directory. The following text is just a proposal, feel free to change it as you see fit:

"pandaSDMX is a libraryaimed at becoming the most intuitive and versatile tool to retrieve and acquire statistical data and metadata disseminated in
SDMX
format. As of v0.2 it works well with the SDMX services of the European statistics office (Eurostat) and the European Central Bank (ECB) both of which provide hundreds of thousands social and economic indicators. While pandaSDMX is extensible
to cater any output format, it currently exports SDMX datasets with observations and/or attributes to multi-indexed pandas DataFrames and Series. Metadata such as datastructure definitions, dataflow definitions, and code lists are represented in terms of the SDMX-2.1 information model."

@jorisvandenbossche
Copy link
Member

I think that could certainly be added. Can you make a PR for this?

@dr-leo
Copy link
Contributor Author

dr-leo commented Apr 21, 2015

Well, why not? Maybe because I have to learn how to rebase. I have an
older PR which should be ok but hasn't been rebased yet. And even if I
did rebase it, I could not compile on Win7 with MinGW. The compiling
instructions works on the install page of pandas are not very helpful.
But yes, for this small PR I'll try again hoping no rebaseing will be
needed.

Am 21.04.2015 um 18:28 schrieb Joris Van den Bossche:

I think that could certainly be added. Can you make a PR for this?


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#9962 (comment).

@jreback
Copy link
Contributor

jreback commented Apr 21, 2015

http://pandas-docs.github.io/pandas-docs-travis/contributing.html are the new contributing guidelines

@jorisvandenbossche
Copy link
Member

For a small addition to the docs, you don't need to compile pandas (or also the docs is not required), so that shouldn't be the problem!
And if there would be a problem with rebasing, we are here to help you

@dr-leo
Copy link
Contributor Author

dr-leo commented Apr 21, 2015

Thanks. I've compiled it for the first time. libpython was missing. - I
need compiling to test my other PR on hashable Series.name which has, I
understand, not been merged yet...

Chances are that I'll finally get there shortly.

Am 21.04.2015 um 23:45 schrieb Joris Van den Bossche:

For a small addition to the docs, you don't need to compile pandas (or
also the docs is not required), so that shouldn't be the problem!
And if there would be a problem with rebasing, we are here to help you


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#9962 (comment).

@dr-leo
Copy link
Contributor Author

dr-leo commented Apr 28, 2015

Done.

#10007

Am 21.04.2015 um 23:45 schrieb Joris Van den Bossche:

For a small addition to the docs, you don't need to compile pandas (or
also the docs is not required), so that shouldn't be the problem!
And if there would be a problem with rebasing, we are here to help you


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#9962 (comment).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants