Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Changed the interface of sort_edge_index to only return single edge_index information in case the edge_attr argument is not specified #6875

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Mar 8, 2023

Conversation

rusty1s
Copy link
Member

@rusty1s rusty1s commented Mar 8, 2023

No description provided.

@rusty1s rusty1s changed the title Revisit sort_edge_index interface Changed the interface of sort_edge_index to only return single edge_index information in case the edge_attr argument is not specified Mar 8, 2023
@rusty1s rusty1s self-assigned this Mar 8, 2023
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 8, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #6875 (deb8efe) into master (97c1a53) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #6875   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   91.52%   91.52%           
=======================================
  Files         427      427           
  Lines       23160    23160           
=======================================
  Hits        21198    21198           
  Misses       1962     1962           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
torch_geometric/transforms/to_sparse_tensor.py 97.14% <100.00%> (ø)
torch_geometric/utils/sort_edge_index.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

@rusty1s rusty1s merged commit b1bc3d3 into master Mar 8, 2023
@rusty1s rusty1s deleted the sort_edge_index branch March 8, 2023 10:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant