[INF] Support Pyspark but not require it? #551
Labels
available for hacking
This issue has not been claimed by any individual.
good intermediate issue
Issues that are good for seasoned programmers to make a contribution
infrastructure
Infrastructure-related issues
I'm trying to catch up on the
pyspark
conversation. But I was wondering if we were supportingpyspark
, but not requiring it @ericmjl , @zjpoh ?I updated my local
pyjanitor
and had to downloadpyspark
as the requirements changed, and it was about215MB
. I think that's fine if it's required for development, but might not expected for users that only anticipate usingpandas
. I believerdkit
is currently optional for those users that will use it (maybe something else too), and I think that could be a good idea here too.Again, I haven't looked through the entire
pyspark
conversation and changes yet.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: