Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve interpretability of interaction function #14

Open
cthoyt opened this issue Jun 27, 2020 · 0 comments
Open

Improve interpretability of interaction function #14

cthoyt opened this issue Jun 27, 2020 · 0 comments
Labels
research corresponds to difficult problems that the KGEM community is still trying to solve

Comments

@cthoyt
Copy link
Member

cthoyt commented Jun 27, 2020

Since each interaction model has a different range (e.g., the values of some interaction functions could be between [-inf,inf], some could be [0, inf], some could be [0, 1]), it makes the interpretation difficult. Even worse, this also has to do with interaction models' constrains on embeddings, etc.

It would be good for all interaction functions to define an "interpretation function" that remaps the results onto the range of [0,1]

From @mberr:

Obtaining such is an active research area and neither straight-forward, nor exists a "unique" solution. In case you are interested, you may want to look for keywords "model calibration" (e.g. Platt scaling), and for KG "triple classification".

@cthoyt cthoyt added enhancement New feature or request research corresponds to difficult problems that the KGEM community is still trying to solve and removed enhancement New feature or request labels Jun 27, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
research corresponds to difficult problems that the KGEM community is still trying to solve
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant