Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add uncertainty for the traditional (non-Bayesian) models #8

Open
drbenvincent opened this issue Oct 21, 2022 · 2 comments
Open

Add uncertainty for the traditional (non-Bayesian) models #8

drbenvincent opened this issue Oct 21, 2022 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request wontfix This will not be worked on

Comments

@drbenvincent
Copy link
Collaborator

drbenvincent commented Oct 21, 2022

Suggested by @juanitorduz. Would be good to get measures of uncertainty for the non-Bayesian models. Could use:

Statsmodels notes

@drbenvincent drbenvincent added the enhancement New feature or request label Oct 21, 2022
@drbenvincent drbenvincent added this to the Stabilise the backend milestone Dec 5, 2022
@NathanielF
Copy link
Contributor

I like statsmodels but we should also consider linearmodels as per @juanitorduz 's suggestion.

I can investigate both backends for the frequentist IV ticket and present the workflow with both for comparison if that helps

@drbenvincent
Copy link
Collaborator Author

FYI: We are pushing ahead with the Bayesian causal inference methods. So there are no immediate plans for this. But if someone out there wants to give this a go, then feel free. It is also worth reviewing the Discussion here #250

@drbenvincent drbenvincent added the wontfix This will not be worked on label Jun 17, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request wontfix This will not be worked on
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants