Request to add classifier License :: OSI Approved :: Free Public License 1.0.0 (0BSD)

[NIC-MichalLabedzki]

Request to add a new Trove classifiers.

The name of the classifier you would like to add

• License :: OSI Approved :: Free Public License 1.0.0 (0BSD)
• License :: OSI Approved :: Zero-Clause BSD (0BSD)

Why do you want to add this classifiers?

Why do the current classifiers not meet your need?

It is new license approved by OSI. See https://opensource.org/licenses/0BSD

How many projects do you expect to use this new classifier?

This license is also as simple as possible so in future - almost all trivial project or "public domain". For now at least one, my project. (and more my projects in future)

If you are requesting multiple classifiers, why do you need more than one?

OSI approved this license with two names, but it is only one license. I prefer "Free Public License" as it somehow describes what it is. 0BSD is also good name but there is a need to know BSD license background. There is only one - 0BSD in SPDX, see https://spdx.org/licenses/ , so at least please add "0BSD".

[NIC-MichalLabedzki]

There are at least three projects using 0BSD: nf, jsonfromschema (both are mine) and mansel (two packages).

[jamadden]

Thanks for the request! Currently, adding license classifiers is generally waiting for a resolution to the umbrella issue pypa/pypi-support#142.

[hannob]

Hi, may I ask what the status here is? I was a bit surprised that I'm not allowed to upload a 0BSD-licensed package to pypi.

The blocking issue mentioned in the comment by @jamadden seems to be this #17 but tbh I don't see how that's related. It seems there are some existing unclear license classifiers, but why does that prevent new licenses from being added?

[di]

If someone wants to make a PR for this, we would merge it.

Note that we generally just want one classifier per SPDX identifier, with the title/identifier aligned with OSI, so this should probably just be:

License :: OSI Approved :: Zero-Clause BSD (0BSD)

per https://opensource.org/license/0BSD

[hannob]

I just wanted to create a PR, but noted that this has already been done:
cee14ba

It also uses exactly the same title/identifier as you proposed - so I guess this issue can be closed?