Allow higher capacity_per_sqkm for solar technology in deserts #362
Labels
feature request
Ask for new features
good first issue
Good for newcomers
help wanted
Extra attention is needed
Allow higher capacity_per_sqkm for solar technology in deserts
We are currently defining how much solar can be installed in a region by a parameter in the config:
https://github.com/pypsa-meets-africa/pypsa-africa/blob/d86fed5a6dee9e6e55b9ceed6ef20042ce6fab16/config.default.yaml#L220
In another issue #361 we compare the assumption and investigate the impact to the technical potential.
The parameter was chosen to represent socio-technical and political limits. The current value in PyPSA-Eur is 1.7 MW/sqkm. The average power density of utility-scale solar power plants is around 45.6 MW/sqkm (confirmed by looking at 41 power plants in a notebook that we upload soon). Maximal observed densities are even around 100sqkm. PyPSA-Eur's current default says that roughly 3.7% (~1.7/0.037=46) of all available areas (which already exclude protected areas and specific landcover codes) can be used for capacity expansion.
Obviously, one can criticize if 3.7% of all available areas is really the socio-technical and political limit or not. We will actually be a bit optimistic and assume that 10%, representing 4.6 MW/sqkm, of all available areas can be used for solar expansion (new solar design also allows synergies between farm & cropland reducing such limitations, see agrivoltaics).
But is this socio-technical and political assumption applicable to deserts (Copernicus LC class 60)? I think no. I would argue that we should do the following:
A pull request should update the solar capacity_per_sqkm for Copernicus class 60 (e.g. desert). The code snippet that might be relevant:
https://github.com/pypsa-meets-africa/pypsa-africa/blob/d86fed5a6dee9e6e55b9ceed6ef20042ce6fab16/scripts/build_renewable_profiles.py#L346-L353
Please give a clear and concise description and provide context why the feature would be useful.
Also, we'd appreciate any implementation ideas and references you already have.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: