Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow higher capacity_per_sqkm for solar technology in deserts #362

Open
pz-max opened this issue Jun 2, 2022 · 2 comments
Open

Allow higher capacity_per_sqkm for solar technology in deserts #362

pz-max opened this issue Jun 2, 2022 · 2 comments
Labels
feature request Ask for new features good first issue Good for newcomers help wanted Extra attention is needed

Comments

@pz-max
Copy link
Member

pz-max commented Jun 2, 2022

Allow higher capacity_per_sqkm for solar technology in deserts

We are currently defining how much solar can be installed in a region by a parameter in the config:
https://github.com/pypsa-meets-africa/pypsa-africa/blob/d86fed5a6dee9e6e55b9ceed6ef20042ce6fab16/config.default.yaml#L220
In another issue #361 we compare the assumption and investigate the impact to the technical potential.

The parameter was chosen to represent socio-technical and political limits. The current value in PyPSA-Eur is 1.7 MW/sqkm. The average power density of utility-scale solar power plants is around 45.6 MW/sqkm (confirmed by looking at 41 power plants in a notebook that we upload soon). Maximal observed densities are even around 100sqkm. PyPSA-Eur's current default says that roughly 3.7% (~1.7/0.037=46) of all available areas (which already exclude protected areas and specific landcover codes) can be used for capacity expansion.

Obviously, one can criticize if 3.7% of all available areas is really the socio-technical and political limit or not. We will actually be a bit optimistic and assume that 10%, representing 4.6 MW/sqkm, of all available areas can be used for solar expansion (new solar design also allows synergies between farm & cropland reducing such limitations, see agrivoltaics).

But is this socio-technical and political assumption applicable to deserts (Copernicus LC class 60)? I think no. I would argue that we should do the following:

  • Using for different land-cover classes different capacity_per_sqkm assumptions. Here, I think the main impact in Africa would be to use the full average power density for deserts (45.6 MW/sqkm). There are simply no socio-techno and political limitations...

A pull request should update the solar capacity_per_sqkm for Copernicus class 60 (e.g. desert). The code snippet that might be relevant:
https://github.com/pypsa-meets-africa/pypsa-africa/blob/d86fed5a6dee9e6e55b9ceed6ef20042ce6fab16/scripts/build_renewable_profiles.py#L346-L353

Please give a clear and concise description and provide context why the feature would be useful.
Also, we'd appreciate any implementation ideas and references you already have.

@pz-max pz-max added help wanted Extra attention is needed good first issue Good for newcomers feature request Ask for new features labels Jun 2, 2022
@ekatef
Copy link
Collaborator

ekatef commented Apr 3, 2024

An updated link to Copernicus land coverage codes: https://land.copernicus.eu/en/technical-library/global-dynamic-land-cover-product-user-manual-v3.0/@@download/file

FYI @GbotemiB

@ekatef
Copy link
Collaborator

ekatef commented Apr 3, 2024

A recent work of PV/CSP capacity: Franke, Katja and Fragoso, Joshua and Kleinschmitt, Christoph and Sensfuß, Frank, Assessing Worldwide Future Potentials of Renewable Electricity Generation: Installable Capacity, Full Load Hours, and Costs. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4526901 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4526901

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature request Ask for new features good first issue Good for newcomers help wanted Extra attention is needed
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants