You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As discussed at the 5/22 and 5/29 GSOC2020 ESDA calls, there is an open question as to what style format the new ESDA estimators might (or should) take. In general, three potential candidate formats were discussed:
In my current draft of each estimator, I've opted for a scikit-learn format. I also drafted a few of them in legacy format (see Join_Counts_Local_old for legacy format vs Local_Join_Counts for scikit-learn format in previous link).
Wanted to raise this issue and open it up for discussion!
(can't seem to tag the issue for GSOC2020 or a project-specific GSOC2020_ESDA_ENH...)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
As discussed at the 5/22 and 5/29 GSOC2020 ESDA calls, there is an open question as to what style format the new ESDA estimators might (or should) take. In general, three potential candidate formats were discussed:
In my current draft of each estimator, I've opted for a scikit-learn format. I also drafted a few of them in legacy format (see
Join_Counts_Local_old
for legacy format vsLocal_Join_Counts
for scikit-learn format in previous link).Wanted to raise this issue and open it up for discussion!
(can't seem to tag the issue for
GSOC2020
or a project-specificGSOC2020_ESDA_ENH
...)The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: