New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[WIP] rename [batch_]psi methods to [batch_]joint_features #33
Conversation
btw @larsmans you can speed up all tests by a factor of ~10 by setting the default inference to |
Haven't tried to install that yet, but I will if I find enough time to play with this stuff longer :) |
it should be in a state where you can install it via pip using the repo from the requirements file. if travis can do it, I'm sure you can do it, too ;) |
ok, another try pushed to master ;) |
What to do with size_psi?
I'm ok with the rename. |
I don't have a problem with it, but I also don't think it's any clearer. On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 8:57 AM, zaxtax notifications@github.com wrote:
773.888.2718 |
Ok, I agree that this is an improvement after I noticed the different uses if psi in graphical models and structured prediction. For someone reading Bishop, the name \psi is indeed quite confusing. |
unfortunately my realization came too late and I I have to deprecate ^^ |
Having read some more, I found out that in NLP at least, this is usually called Φ (which I think makes sense since it's a feature function). |
Yeah, I will also call it \phi in my thesis now - it is also called that in the Nowozin Lampert book ;) |
Done in 354ea19. |
I haven't run the tests yet; this affects the entire codebase and the full test suite is so slow on my box that I'm leaving it to Travis.
What to do with
size_psi
? Rename itjoint_size
?