Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Project status #9

Closed
mikenerone opened this issue Dec 11, 2020 · 2 comments
Closed

Project status #9

mikenerone opened this issue Dec 11, 2020 · 2 comments

Comments

@mikenerone
Copy link
Member

mikenerone commented Dec 11, 2020

I'd like to ask what the current status of the trio-amqp project is. Is this considered production ready and recommended for use? I notice it's a bit behind on merges from the aioamqp project from which it was forked, but not having dug into it, that may be because it is now independent, and any needs that apply have been addressed.

I also notice that you have an anyio-oriented AMQP implementation at https://github.com/M-o-a-T/asyncamqp, which is up to date with aioamqp, but has not been published to PyPI (in fact, there's now a separate project published under the same name). Is that the library you would recommend for use in a trio application currently?

Any related guidance you might be able to provide regarding a client library (for RabbitMQ specifically if that matters) in a trio-based app would be appreciated (even if these libraries aren't production-ready and the suggestion is to use an asyncio lib via trio-asyncio instead).

@smurfix
Copy link
Collaborator

smurfix commented Dec 12, 2020

The pypi asyncamqp was there earlier, I didn't yet rename the thing. I've been using trio-amqp in production for a couple months, seems to be stable enough, but what do I know ;-)

It's probably easiest to merge the MoaT asyncamqp back into trio-amqp and continue to use that name.

@mikenerone
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks much for the update. I will go ahead and use trio-amqp then. :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants