licence/license confusion

[akuchling]

BPO	412271
Nosy	@gvanrossum, @akuchling

^{Note: these values reflect the state of the issue at the time it was migrated and might not reflect the current state.}

Show more details

GitHub fields:

assignee = 'https://github.com/akuchling'
closed_at = <Date 2001-08-10.19:08:01.000>
created_at = <Date 2001-03-29.19:38:34.000>
labels = ['library']
title = 'licence/license confusion'
updated_at = <Date 2001-08-10.19:08:01.000>
user = 'https://github.com/akuchling'

bugs.python.org fields:

activity = <Date 2001-08-10.19:08:01.000>
actor = 'akuchling'
assignee = 'akuchling'
closed = True
closed_date = None
closer = None
components = ['Distutils']
creation = <Date 2001-03-29.19:38:34.000>
creator = 'akuchling'
dependencies = []
files = []
hgrepos = []
issue_num = 412271
keywords = []
message_count = 4.0
messages = ['4121', '4122', '4123', '4124']
nosy_count = 2.0
nosy_names = ['gvanrossum', 'akuchling']
pr_nums = []
priority = 'high'
resolution = 'fixed'
stage = None
status = 'closed'
superseder = None
type = None
url = 'https://bugs.python.org/issue412271'
versions = []

[akuchling]

Thomas Heller points out:

Playing with the new meta info, I noticed that the
license specified in this way:

setup(..., license="MIT/X11", ...)

isn't recognized, while it works if one uses:

setup(..., licence="MIT/X11", ...)

BTW; according to www.opensource.org the MIT license
seems to be spelled MIT license nowadays, no longer
MIT/X11 license.

[gvanrossum]

Logged In: YES
user_id=6380

andrew, were you going to fix this before 2.1?

[akuchling]

Logged In: YES
user_id=11375

No, I wasn't planning to.

[akuchling]

Logged In: YES
user_id=11375

Fixed in revision 1.48 of dist.py. I've also edited PEP-241 to just say "MIT license".