PropertyType is not defined in types.py

[nnorwitz]

BPO	509965
Nosy	@loewis
Files	patch-types: patch to add PropertyType

^{Note: these values reflect the state of the issue at the time it was migrated and might not reflect the current state.}

Show more details

GitHub fields:

assignee = None
closed_at = <Date 2002-01-31.02:32:03.000>
created_at = <Date 2002-01-29.00:47:48.000>
labels = ['library']
title = 'PropertyType is not defined in types.py'
updated_at = <Date 2002-01-31.02:32:03.000>
user = 'https://bugs.python.org/nnorwitz'

bugs.python.org fields:

activity = <Date 2002-01-31.02:32:03.000>
actor = 'nnorwitz'
assignee = 'none'
closed = True
closed_date = None
closer = None
components = ['Library (Lib)']
creation = <Date 2002-01-29.00:47:48.000>
creator = 'nnorwitz'
dependencies = []
files = ['3925']
hgrepos = []
issue_num = 509965
keywords = ['patch']
message_count = 3.0
messages = ['38805', '38806', '38807']
nosy_count = 2.0
nosy_names = ['loewis', 'nnorwitz']
pr_nums = []
priority = 'normal'
resolution = None
stage = None
status = 'closed'
superseder = None
type = None
url = 'https://bugs.python.org/issue509965'
versions = ['Python 2.3']

[nnorwitz]

types.py doesn't define PropertyType.
The attached patch defines it.

[loewis]

Logged In: YES
user_id=21627

What would be wrong with

PropertyType = property

In the light of the new-style builtins, is that even needed?

[nnorwitz]

Logged In: YES
user_id=33168

I did this thinking about things the old way (pre-2.2)
and trying to keep consistency.

After thinking about it, I don't think it's worthwhile
to implement this patch, so I'm closing it.