Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fuzziness in inspect module documentatio #36682

Closed
pinard mannequin opened this issue Jun 1, 2002 · 2 comments
Closed

Fuzziness in inspect module documentatio #36682

pinard mannequin opened this issue Jun 1, 2002 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
docs Documentation in the Doc dir

Comments

@pinard
Copy link
Mannequin

pinard mannequin commented Jun 1, 2002

BPO 563298
Nosy @freddrake

Note: these values reflect the state of the issue at the time it was migrated and might not reflect the current state.

Show more details

GitHub fields:

assignee = 'https://github.com/freddrake'
closed_at = <Date 2004-01-01.07:23:07.000>
created_at = <Date 2002-06-01.14:03:14.000>
labels = ['docs']
title = 'Fuzziness in inspect module documentatio'
updated_at = <Date 2004-01-01.07:23:07.000>
user = 'https://bugs.python.org/pinard'

bugs.python.org fields:

activity = <Date 2004-01-01.07:23:07.000>
actor = 'fdrake'
assignee = 'fdrake'
closed = True
closed_date = None
closer = None
components = ['Documentation']
creation = <Date 2002-06-01.14:03:14.000>
creator = 'pinard'
dependencies = []
files = []
hgrepos = []
issue_num = 563298
keywords = []
message_count = 2.0
messages = ['11003', '11004']
nosy_count = 2.0
nosy_names = ['fdrake', 'pinard']
pr_nums = []
priority = 'normal'
resolution = 'fixed'
stage = None
status = 'closed'
superseder = None
type = None
url = 'https://bugs.python.org/issue563298'
versions = []

@pinard
Copy link
Mannequin Author

pinard mannequin commented Jun 1, 2002

Hello, Fred.

I'm looking at Web pages about the inspect' module, and more precisely inspect-stack.html'. The text speaks about "higher"
and "lower", "above"
and "below", and this is ambiguous as people would draw
the stack top up,
and other would draw the stack top down. Do you agree
that this could
be clarified?

The text could rather stick with words like "recent" or
"older", or "near
the top" or "away from the top", maybe. Beware that
the word "deeper"
is ambiguous too. Or else, the text could explain the
drawing convention
for stacks used in the text, so people could interpret
what is written.

One might try to guess the drawing conventions from the
fact functions have
"outer" and "inner" in their name, but this is too
difficult.

Maybe the text could use "outer" and "inner" more
systematically, all over?
It would most probably create more clarity.

@pinard pinard mannequin closed this as completed Jun 1, 2002
@pinard pinard mannequin assigned freddrake Jun 1, 2002
@pinard pinard mannequin added the docs Documentation in the Doc dir label Jun 1, 2002
@pinard pinard mannequin closed this as completed Jun 1, 2002
@pinard pinard mannequin assigned freddrake Jun 1, 2002
@pinard pinard mannequin added the docs Documentation in the Doc dir label Jun 1, 2002
@freddrake
Copy link
Member

Logged In: YES
user_id=3066

Fixed in Doc/lib/libinspect.tex revisions 1.15, 1.13.10.2.

@ezio-melotti ezio-melotti transferred this issue from another repository Apr 9, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
docs Documentation in the Doc dir
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant