change 0,1 to False,True in dict.has_key doc

[dalke]

BPO	775836
Nosy	@freddrake, @rhettinger

^{Note: these values reflect the state of the issue at the time it was migrated and might not reflect the current state.}

Show more details

GitHub fields:

assignee = 'https://github.com/rhettinger'
closed_at = <Date 2003-08-08.11:08:56.000>
created_at = <Date 2003-07-22.19:43:47.000>
labels = ['docs']
title = 'change 0,1 to False,True in dict.has_key doc'
updated_at = <Date 2003-08-08.11:08:56.000>
user = 'https://bugs.python.org/dalke'

bugs.python.org fields:

activity = <Date 2003-08-08.11:08:56.000>
actor = 'rhettinger'
assignee = 'rhettinger'
closed = True
closed_date = None
closer = None
components = ['Documentation']
creation = <Date 2003-07-22.19:43:47.000>
creator = 'dalke'
dependencies = []
files = []
hgrepos = []
issue_num = 775836
keywords = []
message_count = 5.0
messages = ['17238', '17239', '17240', '17241', '17242']
nosy_count = 4.0
nosy_names = ['fdrake', 'nnorwitz', 'rhettinger', 'dalke']
pr_nums = []
priority = 'normal'
resolution = 'fixed'
stage = None
status = 'closed'
superseder = None
type = None
url = 'https://bugs.python.org/issue775836'
versions = ['Python 2.4']

[dalke]

http://python.org/doc/2.3c1/lib/typesmapping.html

says in the table

a.has_key(k) | 1 if a has a key k, else 0

Under Python 2.3 this is True / False

>>> {1:2}.has_key(1)
True
>>> {1:2}.has_key(2)
False
>>>

[nnorwitz]

Logged In: YES
user_id=33168

Fred, not sure if this should be fixed for 2.3 or wait.

[freddrake]

Logged In: YES
user_id=3066

It'll have to wait for 2.3.1/2.4. We've done (more than)
enough at this point.

[rhettinger]

Logged In: YES
user_id=80475

I'll fix it after Py2.3 is done.

[rhettinger]

Logged In: YES
user_id=80475

Fixed.
See Doc/lib/libstdtypes.tex 1.130 and 1.129.8.1