readline should be in PackageManager database

[etrepum]

BPO	776602
Nosy	@jackjansen, @etrepum

^{Note: these values reflect the state of the issue at the time it was migrated and might not reflect the current state.}

Show more details

GitHub fields:

assignee = 'https://github.com/jackjansen'
closed_at = <Date 2003-07-30.12:02:58.000>
created_at = <Date 2003-07-23.23:58:50.000>
labels = ['OS-mac']
title = 'readline should be in PackageManager database'
updated_at = <Date 2003-07-30.12:02:58.000>
user = 'https://github.com/etrepum'

bugs.python.org fields:

activity = <Date 2003-07-30.12:02:58.000>
actor = 'jackjansen'
assignee = 'jackjansen'
closed = True
closed_date = None
closer = None
components = ['macOS']
creation = <Date 2003-07-23.23:58:50.000>
creator = 'bob.ippolito'
dependencies = []
files = []
hgrepos = []
issue_num = 776602
keywords = []
message_count = 2.0
messages = ['17315', '17316']
nosy_count = 2.0
nosy_names = ['jackjansen', 'bob.ippolito']
pr_nums = []
priority = 'normal'
resolution = 'fixed'
stage = None
status = 'closed'
superseder = None
type = None
url = 'https://bugs.python.org/issue776602'
versions = ['Python 2.3']

[etrepum]

http://undefined.org/~bob/readline-0.0.1.tgz is a source
installation of the readline module that downloads readline
from gnu.org, compiles a static readline, and links Python
with it.. therefore it does not depend on fink or a developer
tools installation. A binary installer could easily be created
using this.

[jackjansen]

Logged In: YES
user_id=45365

It is now.

I took your readline-0.0.1, replaced readline.c with the official 2.3
one, renamed the whole thing to "readline-2.3" and added it to
PackMan in both source and binary form.