We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Note: these values reflect the state of the issue at the time it was migrated and might not reflect the current state.
GitHub fields:
assignee = None closed_at = <Date 2009-01-12.13:31:00.977> created_at = <Date 2004-01-21.09:35:31.000> labels = ['library'] title = 'Overflow in Python Profiler' updated_at = <Date 2009-01-12.13:31:00.938> user = 'https://bugs.python.org/schiotz'
bugs.python.org fields:
activity = <Date 2009-01-12.13:31:00.938> actor = 'amaury.forgeotdarc' assignee = 'none' closed = True closed_date = <Date 2009-01-12.13:31:00.977> closer = 'amaury.forgeotdarc' components = ['Library (Lib)'] creation = <Date 2004-01-21.09:35:31.000> creator = 'schiotz' dependencies = [] files = ['1175'] hgrepos = [] issue_num = 881261 keywords = [] message_count = 2.0 messages = ['19736', '79675'] nosy_count = 2.0 nosy_names = ['amaury.forgeotdarc', 'schiotz'] pr_nums = [] priority = 'normal' resolution = 'out of date' stage = None status = 'closed' superseder = '645894' type = None url = 'https://bugs.python.org/issue881261' versions = ['Python 2.3']
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
When profiling code that runs very long (36 hours), negative times are reported. I suspect an integer overflow somewhere.
Sorry, something went wrong.
on POSIX, clock() indeed wraps around after some time. This was corrected with bpo-645894, and is available since python 2.5.
No branches or pull requests
Note: these values reflect the state of the issue at the time it was migrated and might not reflect the current state.
Show more details
GitHub fields:
bugs.python.org fields:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: