Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Right-click behavior from Windows Explorer #50067

Closed
Mkopinsky mannequin opened this issue Apr 23, 2009 · 6 comments
Closed

Right-click behavior from Windows Explorer #50067

Mkopinsky mannequin opened this issue Apr 23, 2009 · 6 comments
Assignees
Labels
topic-IDLE type-feature A feature request or enhancement

Comments

@Mkopinsky
Copy link
Mannequin

Mkopinsky mannequin commented Apr 23, 2009

BPO 5817
Nosy @kbkaiser, @taleinat

Note: these values reflect the state of the issue at the time it was migrated and might not reflect the current state.

Show more details

GitHub fields:

assignee = 'https://github.com/kbkaiser'
closed_at = <Date 2010-07-21.06:38:35.183>
created_at = <Date 2009-04-23.00:38:02.694>
labels = ['expert-IDLE', 'type-feature']
title = 'Right-click behavior from Windows Explorer'
updated_at = <Date 2010-07-21.06:38:35.182>
user = 'https://bugs.python.org/Mkopinsky'

bugs.python.org fields:

activity = <Date 2010-07-21.06:38:35.182>
actor = 'Mkopinsky'
assignee = 'kbk'
closed = True
closed_date = <Date 2010-07-21.06:38:35.183>
closer = 'Mkopinsky'
components = ['IDLE']
creation = <Date 2009-04-23.00:38:02.694>
creator = 'Mkopinsky'
dependencies = []
files = []
hgrepos = []
issue_num = 5817
keywords = []
message_count = 6.0
messages = ['86346', '110913', '110956', '110980', '110985', '111010']
nosy_count = 3.0
nosy_names = ['kbk', 'taleinat', 'Mkopinsky']
pr_nums = []
priority = 'normal'
resolution = None
stage = 'needs patch'
status = 'closed'
superseder = None
type = 'enhancement'
url = 'https://bugs.python.org/issue5817'
versions = ['Python 3.2']

@Mkopinsky
Copy link
Mannequin Author

Mkopinsky mannequin commented Apr 23, 2009

When I right-click on a .py file in Windows Explorer and click Edit with
IDLE, it currently opens a completely new instance of IDLE (with two
windows, one for shell and one for editing the file). It would be better
if it just opened the file as an additional window in the already
running IDLE instance (assuming IDLE is already running).

@Mkopinsky Mkopinsky mannequin added topic-IDLE type-feature A feature request or enhancement labels Apr 23, 2009
@BreamoreBoy BreamoreBoy mannequin assigned kbkaiser Jul 10, 2010
@taleinat
Copy link
Contributor

Just to get this on the table: What is the benefit of having it opened in the same instance of IDLE rather than a new instance?

@Mkopinsky
Copy link
Mannequin Author

Mkopinsky mannequin commented Jul 20, 2010

The thing that bugged me when I created the ticket is that since IDLE uses two windows for every instance, that means that if you open three files, you'll have six windows open. I was bugged by constantly switching to the wrong window, etc.

@taleinat
Copy link
Contributor

I'm quite sure that issue has already been addressed. Specifically r71126 made it so that running IDLE with -e always opens just an editor window. "Edit with IDLE" runs IDLE with -e.

With which version of Python do you see this happening, Michael?

@Mkopinsky
Copy link
Mannequin Author

Mkopinsky mannequin commented Jul 21, 2010

I haven't really done any active Python development in a while. When I reported this back in April 2009 I was presumably using whatever was current then (2.6.x, I guess), but haven't tested it since. If you tell me that in newer versions it is corrected, I will be happy to have this marked as resolved.

@taleinat
Copy link
Contributor

That makes sense. I think this issue can be closed.

For future reference, the original feature request has a benefit beyond not having a shell window open for every editor window. Opening different files in the same instance of IDLE allows running them in the same shell easily via "Run Module". However, IMO this would be much too small a benefit compared to the effort required to achieve it.

@Mkopinsky Mkopinsky mannequin closed this as completed Jul 21, 2010
@ezio-melotti ezio-melotti transferred this issue from another repository Apr 10, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
topic-IDLE type-feature A feature request or enhancement
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants