Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

argparse: type conversion function should be called only once #56985

Closed
arnau mannequin opened this issue Aug 18, 2011 · 21 comments
Closed

argparse: type conversion function should be called only once #56985

arnau mannequin opened this issue Aug 18, 2011 · 21 comments
Labels
stdlib Python modules in the Lib dir type-bug An unexpected behavior, bug, or error

Comments

@arnau
Copy link
Mannequin

arnau mannequin commented Aug 18, 2011

BPO 12776
Nosy @merwok, @bitdancer, @flying-sheep
Files
  • example-argparse-type-function-called-twice.py: Example script showing the issue
  • py2.7-argparse-call-type-function-once.patch: Patch for tip (py2.7) hg branch (2)
  • py3k-argparse-call-type-function-once.patch: Patch for tip (py3k) hg branch (2)
  • argparse_test.py: test case for defaults
  • py2.7-argparse-call-type-function-once-v3.patch: Patch for tip (py2.7) hg branch (3)
  • py3k-argparse-call-type-function-once-v3.patch: Patch for tip (py3k) hg branch (3)
  • py2.7-argparse-call-type-function-once-v4.patch: Patch for tip (py2.7) hg branch (4) -- 'is' rather than ==
  • py3k-argparse-call-type-function-once-v4.patch: Patch for tip (py3k) hg branch (4) -- 'is' rather than ==
  • fopatch: Add test cases for non-existent default file for FileType.
  • py3k-argparse-call-type-function-once-v5.patch
  • Note: these values reflect the state of the issue at the time it was migrated and might not reflect the current state.

    Show more details

    GitHub fields:

    assignee = None
    closed_at = <Date 2012-09-01.03:18:24.828>
    created_at = <Date 2011-08-18.08:57:57.490>
    labels = ['type-bug', 'library']
    title = 'argparse: type conversion function should be called only once'
    updated_at = <Date 2014-05-30.02:44:44.040>
    user = 'https://bugs.python.org/arnau'

    bugs.python.org fields:

    activity = <Date 2014-05-30.02:44:44.040>
    actor = 'paul.j3'
    assignee = 'none'
    closed = True
    closed_date = <Date 2012-09-01.03:18:24.828>
    closer = 'r.david.murray'
    components = ['Library (Lib)']
    creation = <Date 2011-08-18.08:57:57.490>
    creator = 'arnau'
    dependencies = []
    files = ['22926', '22978', '22979', '23767', '23775', '23776', '23972', '23973', '25438', '26467']
    hgrepos = []
    issue_num = 12776
    keywords = ['patch']
    message_count = 21.0
    messages = ['142306', '142620', '142653', '144673', '148234', '148235', '148239', '148241', '148250', '148303', '148304', '149526', '149590', '151988', '156316', '159826', '159827', '166076', '169608', '169610', '185683']
    nosy_count = 8.0
    nosy_names = ['bethard', 'eric.araujo', 'r.david.murray', 'arnau', 'flying sheep', 'python-dev', 'paul.j3', 'Mike.Meyer']
    pr_nums = []
    priority = 'normal'
    resolution = 'fixed'
    stage = 'resolved'
    status = 'closed'
    superseder = None
    type = 'behavior'
    url = 'https://bugs.python.org/issue12776'
    versions = ['Python 2.7', 'Python 3.2', 'Python 3.3']

    @arnau
    Copy link
    Mannequin Author

    arnau mannequin commented Aug 18, 2011

    When specifying a function to be called in type keyword argument of add_argument(), the function is actually called twice (when a default value is set and then when the argument is given).

    While this may not be a problem in most cases (such as converting to an int for example), it is an issue for example when trying to open a file whose filename is given as a default value but is not accessible for whatever reason because the first call will fail whereas only the second should be done. I know this may sound like a twisted example but the type function should not be called twice anyhow IMHO.

    I tested with Python 2.7 and 3.2 from Debian packages only but the bug seems to be present in py3k and 2.7 hg branches as well.

    I have attached a small script showing the issue and two patches (for 2.7 and tip (py3k) hg branches), including an additional test case. All argparse tests pass well with 2.7 and 3.2. Hope that's ok.

    @arnau arnau mannequin added stdlib Python modules in the Lib dir type-bug An unexpected behavior, bug, or error labels Aug 18, 2011
    @merwok
    Copy link
    Member

    merwok commented Aug 21, 2011

    Thanks for the patch. I commented on the code review site, you should have received an email.

    @arnau
    Copy link
    Mannequin Author

    arnau mannequin commented Aug 22, 2011

    Thanks for the review. Sorry to send that here instead of the review page, but I get an error when replying: "Invalid XSRF token.".

    This looks good, especially if all existing tests still pass as you report, but
    I wonder about one thing: you have removed the part where the conversion
    function was applied to the default value, so I expected you to edit the other
    line were the conversion function was already called, but that’s not the case.
    Am I misunderstanding something?

    Yes, sorry, I should have perhaps explained it in further details... Here are some examples:

    • Example test case 1:
    parser = argparse.ArgumentParser()
    parser.add_argument('--foo', type=type_foo_func, default='foo')
    parser.parse_args('--foo bar'.split())

    => Before the patch, type function is called in parse_known_args() for the default given in add_argument(), and then in _parse_known_args() for '--foo bar' given in parse_args above, whereas type function should have been called only for the second one.

    • Example test case 2:
    parser = argparse.ArgumentParser()
    parser.add_argument('--foo', type=type_foo_func)
    parser.parse_args('--foo bar'.split())

    => This was already working well before my patch.

    • Example test case 3:
    parser = argparse.ArgumentParser()
    parser.add_argument('--foo', type=type_foo_func, default='foo')
    parser.parse_args('')

    => type_foo_func is called after parsing arguments (none in this case) in my patch.

    Therefore, my patch just moves the function type call after parsing the arguments (given to parse_args()) instead of before, only and only if it was not previously given in parse_args().

    http://bugs.python.org/review/12776/diff/3181/9898#newcode1985
    Lib/argparse.py:1985: if hasattr(namespace, action.dest) and \
    It is recommended to use parens to group multi-line statements, backslashes are
    error-prone.

    I have just updated the patch on the bug report. Thanks.

    @arnau
    Copy link
    Mannequin Author

    arnau mannequin commented Sep 30, 2011

    Any news about applying these patches?

    @flying-sheep
    Copy link
    Mannequin

    flying-sheep mannequin commented Nov 24, 2011

    this is annoying:

    i’m creating a reindentation script that reindents any valid python script. the user can specify if, and how many spaces he/she wants to use per indentation level. 0 or leaving the option out means “one tab per level”.

    if the argument is given, appended code works as intended. but in the default case, the code fails for any of the two default values i tried.

    i would expect that one of the default values works: either 0, if the default value is converted via the type function, or "\t" if the default value bypasses it.

    it seems that argparse applies the type function to the default instantly, and then to the argument (be it the already-converted default or a passed option).

    this breaks type functions which aren’t reflexive for values from their result set, i.e.: t(x) = y => t(y) = y must be true for all x that the function can handle

    @arnau
    Copy link
    Mannequin Author

    arnau mannequin commented Nov 24, 2011

    Does the patch I attached fix your issue?

    @flying-sheep
    Copy link
    Mannequin

    flying-sheep mannequin commented Nov 24, 2011

    i don’t know, since i get python from the ubuntu repositories, sorry.

    in which python release will this patch first be integrated?

    @arnau
    Copy link
    Mannequin Author

    arnau mannequin commented Nov 24, 2011

    It would definitely help if you could apply the patch for Python 2.7 manually on your local installation (after making a backup of course). You can just download the patch for Python 2.7 then (only the first part of the patch can be applied, the second part is for the test so it doesn't matter):

    # cd /usr/lib/python2.7/
    # patch -b -p2 -i /PATH/TO/THE/PATCH

    Thanks much.

    @merwok
    Copy link
    Member

    merwok commented Nov 24, 2011

    Mucking with your installed Python is probably a bad idea, and it may also be an old version (compared to the current development version which has seen hundreds of changes) where testing the patch would not give useful results. Please see the devguide.

    @arnau
    Copy link
    Mannequin Author

    arnau mannequin commented Nov 25, 2011

    I have had a look at the issue more closely and my initial patch was not completely right as it didn't work properly with argparse_test.py despite all tests passing.

    Therefore, I have amended my patch to not check whether action.default was a basestring which didn't make sense at all, but check instead if action.default is None (action.default default value is None if not given to add_argument as far as I understand). I also added a test for the issue reported above as it was missing and ran patchcheck to make sure everything was fine. All the tests (include argparse_test.py) passes without problem.

    Could you please apply them? Many thanks.

    @arnau
    Copy link
    Mannequin Author

    arnau mannequin commented Nov 25, 2011

    BTW, about argparse_test, the default should be either '0' or 0 but not '\t' AFAIK because even the default value is converted using the given type function. It fails even with the last 2.7 version but it works well with my patch...

    @bethard
    Copy link
    Mannequin

    bethard mannequin commented Dec 15, 2011

    Could you add a test to verify that custom actions are still getting the converted values passed to their __call__? I suspect this may not be happening under the current patch - if that's the case, you may also need to add conversions in _get_values, where the lines look like "value = action.default".

    Also, "action.default == getattr(namespace, action.dest)" should probably use "is" instead of "==".

    Other than that, the patch looks okay.

    @arnau
    Copy link
    Mannequin Author

    arnau mannequin commented Dec 16, 2011

    Could you add a test to verify that custom actions are still getting
    the converted values passed to their __call__? I suspect this may not
    be happening under the current patch - if that's the case, you may
    also need to add conversions in _get_values, where the lines look like
    "value = action.default".

    There seems to be already a test for that, namely TestActionUserDefined,
    which use type=float and type=int. The value is properly converted to
    {int,float} when passed to __call__(). Just in case, I also tested with
    a 'type' function I defined myself (which only returns float()) for
    OptionalAction and it's working fine.

    Also, "action.default == getattr(namespace, action.dest)" should
    probably use "is" instead of "==".

    Good point, it would be much better. Thanks for the advice. I have just
    modified the patch with that.

    @arnau
    Copy link
    Mannequin Author

    arnau mannequin commented Jan 26, 2012

    ping?

    @arnau
    Copy link
    Mannequin Author

    arnau mannequin commented Mar 19, 2012

    Could you please apply this patch? It's been 4 months without reply now...

    @MikeMeyer
    Copy link
    Mannequin

    MikeMeyer mannequin commented May 3, 2012

    I've just verified that this patch also fixes 13824 and 11839.
    The attached patchfile adds a test to verify that using a non-existent default file fails if you don't specify the argument, and succeeds if you do.

    Could someone please apply it?

    @MikeMeyer
    Copy link
    Mannequin

    MikeMeyer mannequin commented May 3, 2012

    Sorry - got ahead of myself. It doesn't fix 13824. A deeper reading reveals that the problem wasn't quite what I thought it on first glance.

    @bethard
    Copy link
    Mannequin

    bethard mannequin commented Jul 21, 2012

    The patch looks good to me. I've updated it for trunk and to include Mike Meyer's additional test. All argparse tests pass.

    Anyone who's able to commit and backport, please do.

    (I should be able to commit myself, but it's now been too long and my SSH key seems to no longer work. I'll eventually get this sorted out, but as you may have noticed, I don't have much time for argparse these days, so best not to wait on me.)

    @python-dev
    Copy link
    Mannequin

    python-dev mannequin commented Sep 1, 2012

    New changeset 1b614921aefa by R David Murray in branch '3.2':
    bpo-12776,bpo-11839: call argparse type function only once.
    http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/1b614921aefa

    New changeset 74f6d87cd471 by R David Murray in branch 'default':
    Merge bpo-12776,bpo-11839: call argparse type function only once.
    http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/74f6d87cd471

    New changeset 62b5667ef2f4 by R David Murray in branch '2.7':
    bpo-12776,bpo-11839: call argparse type function only once.
    http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/62b5667ef2f4

    @bitdancer
    Copy link
    Member

    Thanks, Arnaud and Mike. (And Steven, of course :)

    @merwok
    Copy link
    Member

    merwok commented Mar 31, 2013

    FTR a contributor to bpo-13271 (--help should work even if a type converter fails) indicated that it’s fixed by this patch, so it may be good to add a regression test.

    @ezio-melotti ezio-melotti transferred this issue from another repository Apr 10, 2022
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Labels
    stdlib Python modules in the Lib dir type-bug An unexpected behavior, bug, or error
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    2 participants