New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
FAQ has outdated information about Stackless #61066
Comments
The FAQ says "It’s [Stackless] still experimental but looks very promising." AFAIK, Stackless is mature. |
I think answer 2 should just say "An alternative is Stackless Python." and let interested people click the link. The entire second sentence should go, and I am not sure how much of the rest of the first is still correct, as Stackless has changed from when it was written. |
New changeset d2867c430333 by Ezio Melotti in branch '3.2': New changeset b66049748535 by Ezio Melotti in branch '3.3': New changeset 547dc3aa3e9a by Ezio Melotti in branch 'default': New changeset 0f24c65fb7e5 by Ezio Melotti in branch '2.7': |
Fixed, thanks for the report! |
Note: these values reflect the state of the issue at the time it was migrated and might not reflect the current state.
Show more details
GitHub fields:
bugs.python.org fields:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: