Add a resource for CLI tests

[serhiy-storchaka]

BPO	22263
Nosy	@pitrou, @ezio-melotti, @voidspace, @zware, @serhiy-storchaka

^{Note: these values reflect the state of the issue at the time it was migrated and might not reflect the current state.}

Show more details

GitHub fields:

assignee = None
closed_at = None
created_at = <Date 2014-08-24.06:47:43.478>
labels = ['type-feature', 'tests']
title = 'Add a resource for CLI tests'
updated_at = <Date 2014-08-26.06:31:09.655>
user = 'https://github.com/serhiy-storchaka'

bugs.python.org fields:

activity = <Date 2014-08-26.06:31:09.655>
actor = 'serhiy.storchaka'
assignee = 'none'
closed = False
closed_date = None
closer = None
components = ['Tests']
creation = <Date 2014-08-24.06:47:43.478>
creator = 'serhiy.storchaka'
dependencies = []
files = []
hgrepos = []
issue_num = 22263
keywords = []
message_count = 3.0
messages = ['225796', '225896', '225908']
nosy_count = 5.0
nosy_names = ['pitrou', 'ezio.melotti', 'michael.foord', 'zach.ware', 'serhiy.storchaka']
pr_nums = []
priority = 'normal'
resolution = None
stage = None
status = 'open'
superseder = None
type = 'enhancement'
url = 'https://bugs.python.org/issue22263'
versions = ['Python 2.7', 'Python 3.4', 'Python 3.5']

[serhiy-storchaka]

Some modules have command-line interface (not always documented and tested). Their tests run a lot of subprocesses and requires long time, often longer than other tests of corresponding module. However command-line interface itself is much less important than Python interface. In the face of addition of more CLI tests it would be good to introduce new resource ("commandline" or "cli") which will control the run of such tests.

[pitrou]

Or you could use the existing "cpu" resource.

[serhiy-storchaka]

Looks reasonable. On other hand, there is the "subprocess" resource which currently is not used in any test.