4.4. break and continue Statements, and else Clauses on Loops

[joesatriani]

BPO	33424
Nosy	@tim-one, @stevendaprano

^{Note: these values reflect the state of the issue at the time it was migrated and might not reflect the current state.}

Show more details

GitHub fields:

assignee = None
closed_at = <Date 2018-05-04.03:10:36.475>
created_at = <Date 2018-05-04.03:07:20.656>
labels = []
title = '4.4. break and continue Statements, and else Clauses on Loops'
updated_at = <Date 2018-05-04.06:38:23.482>
user = 'https://bugs.python.org/joesatriani'

bugs.python.org fields:

activity = <Date 2018-05-04.06:38:23.482>
actor = 'steven.daprano'
assignee = 'none'
closed = True
closed_date = <Date 2018-05-04.03:10:36.475>
closer = 'tim.peters'
components = []
creation = <Date 2018-05-04.03:07:20.656>
creator = 'joesatriani'
dependencies = []
files = []
hgrepos = []
issue_num = 33424
keywords = []
message_count = 3.0
messages = ['316158', '316159', '316160']
nosy_count = 3.0
nosy_names = ['tim.peters', 'steven.daprano', 'joesatriani']
pr_nums = []
priority = 'normal'
resolution = 'rejected'
stage = 'resolved'
status = 'closed'
superseder = None
type = None
url = 'https://bugs.python.org/issue33424'
versions = []

[joesatriani]

range function second parameter is excluded. Hence for x in range(2, n): will not execute when n = 2, and "2 is a prime number" will never appear.
Moreover, might need a break in the else block too.

[tim-one]

Closing because this appears to be senseless.

[stevendaprano]

Joe, we have no idea what you think is the bug.

It is intentional that the second argument for range is excluded. This is called an "half-open" range, and it helps avoid off-by-one and signpost errors.

Your comments about break, continue and else don't seem to actually mean anything. Please write in complete English sentences and explain the nature of the supposed bug.