New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Porting Python 2 to Python 3 example contradicts its own advice #78275
Comments
https://docs.python.org/3/howto/pyporting.html#use-feature-detection-instead-of-version-detection In this section, the (very good) advice is "It would be better to treat Python 2 as the exceptional case instead of Python 3 and assume that future Python versions will be more compatible with Python 3 than Python 2" However, it then goes on to present the best solution (for dealing with library imports) is this: try: This is literally treating Python 3 as the exception, completely contradicting the advice given a few lines earlier. Practically, it also has the effect that, as Python 3 adoption spreads, import errors and automatic retries will become *more* common and then universal, adding a small amount of delay and noise to the entire Python estate. And that's not considering the case where both libraries are installed to cope with old code relying on the old library (in which case you surely want new code to default to using the new library) If the example is simply changed to try: then both the contradiction and the practical problems go away |
I don't agree with your conclusion here: importlib2 is a PyPI package that backports Python 3's importlib to Python 2, thus the ImportError will only be raised on Python 2 with the example as written. |
Ah, doh. my bad. On 11 July 2018 at 16:09, Zachary Ware <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:
|
Note: these values reflect the state of the issue at the time it was migrated and might not reflect the current state.
Show more details
GitHub fields:
bugs.python.org fields:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: