Format Spec example says limited to 3.1+ but works in 2.7

[mlm]

BPO	35831
Nosy	@freddrake

^{Note: these values reflect the state of the issue at the time it was migrated and might not reflect the current state.}

Show more details

GitHub fields:

assignee = None
closed_at = <Date 2019-01-26.04:12:43.274>
created_at = <Date 2019-01-26.04:06:00.716>
labels = ['3.7', '3.8', 'docs']
title = 'Format Spec example says limited to 3.1+ but works in 2.7'
updated_at = <Date 2019-01-26.04:12:43.272>
user = 'https://bugs.python.org/mlm'

bugs.python.org fields:

activity = <Date 2019-01-26.04:12:43.272>
actor = 'fdrake'
assignee = 'docs@python'
closed = True
closed_date = <Date 2019-01-26.04:12:43.274>
closer = 'fdrake'
components = ['Documentation']
creation = <Date 2019-01-26.04:06:00.716>
creator = 'mlm'
dependencies = []
files = []
hgrepos = []
issue_num = 35831
keywords = []
message_count = 2.0
messages = ['334385', '334386']
nosy_count = 3.0
nosy_names = ['fdrake', 'mlm', 'docs@python']
pr_nums = []
priority = 'normal'
resolution = None
stage = 'resolved'
status = 'closed'
superseder = None
type = None
url = 'https://bugs.python.org/issue35831'
versions = ['Python 3.4', 'Python 3.5', 'Python 3.6', 'Python 3.7', 'Python 3.8']

[mlm]

https://docs.python.org/3/library/string.html#format-examples includes this line:

'{}, {}, {}'.format('a', 'b', 'c')  # 3.1+ only

This does in fact work in 2.7. I don't see anything special about this -- seems an entirely straightforward format.

[freddrake]

The 3.X docs generally don't refer to the 2.X series.

What that comment is pointing out is that leaving the field identifier out (the number inside the {...} placeholder syntax) was not in the 3.0, but added in 3.1.

Unfortunately, I don't have a 3.0 interpreter available to show the exception that's raised.

No change is required.