Warn about invalid PYTHONUSERBASE

[Volker-Weissmann]

BPO	40203
Nosy	@terryjreedy, @Volker-Weissmann

^{Note: these values reflect the state of the issue at the time it was migrated and might not reflect the current state.}

Show more details

GitHub fields:

assignee = None
closed_at = None
created_at = <Date 2020-04-06.12:59:15.393>
labels = ['interpreter-core', 'type-feature', '3.9']
title = 'Warn about invalid PYTHONUSERBASE'
updated_at = <Date 2020-04-11.11:54:27.408>
user = 'https://github.com/Volker-Weissmann'

bugs.python.org fields:

activity = <Date 2020-04-11.11:54:27.408>
actor = 'Volker Wei\xc3\x9fmann'
assignee = 'none'
closed = False
closed_date = None
closer = None
components = ['Interpreter Core']
creation = <Date 2020-04-06.12:59:15.393>
creator = 'Volker Wei\xc3\x9fmann'
dependencies = []
files = []
hgrepos = []
issue_num = 40203
keywords = []
message_count = 4.0
messages = ['365851', '365857', '366156', '366203']
nosy_count = 2.0
nosy_names = ['terry.reedy', 'Volker Wei\xc3\x9fmann']
pr_nums = []
priority = 'normal'
resolution = None
stage = None
status = 'open'
superseder = None
type = 'enhancement'
url = 'https://bugs.python.org/issue40203'
versions = ['Python 3.9']

[Volker-Weissmann]

https://docs.python.org/2/using/cmdline.html says that PYTHONUSERBASE defines the user base directory. If I understand this correctly, this implies that PYTHONUSERBASE should be a path a directory. I therefore think that python should print a warning if PYTHONUSERBASE is:

1. Not a valid path (e.g. "invalid//path")
2. A path to something else than a directory
3. A non existing path (maybe)

I think that

export PYTHONUSERBASE="invalid//path"
python

should generate a warning, because there is no good reason to do so.

[Volker-Weissmann]

Forget the thing I said about "invalid//path", but my argument still stands for non existing paths or paths to something else than a directory.

[terryjreedy]

I marked this for 'interpreter Core' because it affects imports and nothing else seemed better.

I marked this for 3.9 because it is too late to change 2.7. But I don't know whether PYTHONUSERBASE is still treated (or not treated) the same.

Volker, I assume that you meant 'no good reason to not do so'. A possible reason is that checking the validity of all environmental variables at startup would slow down startup, whereas we have been trying to speed it up. Also, if PYTHONUSERBASE, in particular, is ever used for an import, a bad value will result in an import error.

[Volker-Weissmann]

"there is no good reason to do so" meant that there is no good reason to set PYTHONUSERBASE to non existing path or a path that is not a directory.

The history behind this bug report is that I used a program that, because of a bug in this program, set PYTHONUSERBASE to a non existing path, and I wondered why "import cython" raised a ModuleNotFoundError even though I had installed cython.