-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
spec_set/autospec/spec seems to not be reading attributes defined in class body #85041
Comments
Hello, I really like that this library allows for really strict mocking however one thing I have noticed is that it seems like using spec on a mock does not properly read the class body for attributes like some of the documentation claims. For example this is a snippet of the Logger class in python 3.6's class Logger(Filterer):
name: str
level: int
parent: Union[Logger, PlaceHolder]
propagate: bool
handlers: List[Handler]
disabled: int Now I want to mock that class ensuring that propagate gets set to False for example from unittest import mock
from logging import Logger
logger = mock.Mock(spec_set=Logger)
logger.propagate = False
assert logger.propagate is False
*** AttributeError: Mock object has no attribute 'propagate' I have noticed this does work when the value is initialized in the class body so for example class Logger(Filterer):
name: str
level: int
parent: Union[Logger, PlaceHolder]
propagate: bool = False
handlers: List[Handler]
disabled: int This would not fail with the test in question. Wondering if this is intended behavior or not or if I am misunderstanding something. I have tested this with Python 3.6.10, 3.8.2, all with the same result. |
Sorry one small note, the error in the example happens on logger.propagate = False and not assert logger.propagate is False |
mock uses dir to iterate through the attributes that needs to be specced [0]. Unless the variable is initialized it's not listed in dir. Below is an example where age is initialized and name is not. name is not present in dir(Person) and hence spec will not be able to detect this. This is similar to https://bugs.python.org/issue36580. cat /tmp/baz.py print(dir(Person))
print(Person.name) python /tmp/baz.py
['__annotations__', '__class__', '__delattr__', '__dict__', '__dir__', '__doc__', '__eq__', '__format__', '__ge__', '__getattribute__', '__gt__', '__hash__', '__init__', '__init_subclass__', '__le__', '__lt__', '__module__', '__ne__', '__new__', '__reduce__', '__reduce_ex__', '__repr__', '__setattr__', '__sizeof__', '__str__', '__subclasshook__', '__weakref__', 'age']
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/tmp/baz.py", line 6, in <module>
print(Person.name)
AttributeError: type object 'Person' has no attribute 'name' [0] Line 2647 in e005ead
|
Rereading the documentation, I see that a class attribute set to null will return a MagicMock for that attribute. That might be a reasonable workaround. Perhaps the more concrete solution would be that dir lists uninitialized class attributes and if a type hint is present the class attributes uses a spec of that type hint. |
Reflecting on it more, there should be a sensible way to retrieve the set attributes of the init method of any class without explicitly instantiating it, via the inspect module. |
Note: these values reflect the state of the issue at the time it was migrated and might not reflect the current state.
Show more details
GitHub fields:
bugs.python.org fields:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: