Assigning function parameter to class attribute by the same name

[jennydaman]

BPO	43380
Nosy	@ericvsmith, @stevendaprano, @jennydaman

^{Note: these values reflect the state of the issue at the time it was migrated and might not reflect the current state.}

Show more details

GitHub fields:

assignee = None
closed_at = None
created_at = <Date 2021-03-03.00:36:29.041>
labels = ['interpreter-core', 'type-bug', '3.9', '3.10']
title = 'Assigning function parameter to class attribute by the same name'
updated_at = <Date 2021-03-03.09:19:41.364>
user = 'https://github.com/jennydaman'

bugs.python.org fields:

activity = <Date 2021-03-03.09:19:41.364>
actor = 'steven.daprano'
assignee = 'none'
closed = False
closed_date = None
closer = None
components = ['Interpreter Core']
creation = <Date 2021-03-03.00:36:29.041>
creator = 'jennydaman'
dependencies = []
files = []
hgrepos = []
issue_num = 43380
keywords = []
message_count = 6.0
messages = ['387987', '387990', '387991', '387992', '388005', '388008']
nosy_count = 3.0
nosy_names = ['eric.smith', 'steven.daprano', 'jennydaman']
pr_nums = []
priority = 'normal'
resolution = None
stage = None
status = 'open'
superseder = None
type = 'behavior'
url = 'https://bugs.python.org/issue43380'
versions = ['Python 3.9', 'Python 3.10']

[jennydaman]

# Example

Consider these three examples, which are theoretically identical

a = 4

class A:
    a = a

print(A.a)

def createB(b):
    class B:
        z = b
    print(B.z)
    
createB(5)

def createD(D):
    class D:
        d = d
    print(D.d)
    
createD(6)

## Expected Output

4
5
6

## Actual Output

4
5
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
  File "<stdin>", line 2, in createD
  File "<stdin>", line 3, in D
NameError: name 'd' is not defined

[ericvsmith]

Was
def createD(D):

supposed to be:
def createD(d):

?

Not that that changes your problem. I just want to understand the exact issue.

[jennydaman]

# Example

Consider these three examples, which are theoretically identical

a = 4

class A:
    a = a

print(A.a)

def createB(b):
    class B:
        z = b
    print(B.z)
    
createB(5)

def createD(d):
    class D:
        d = d
    print(D.d)
    
createD(6)

## Expected Output

4
5
6

## Actual Output

4
5
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
  File "<stdin>", line 2, in createD
  File "<stdin>", line 3, in D
NameError: name 'd' is not defined

[jennydaman]

Yes sorry that was a typo

[stevendaprano]

Here's an example that shows what is going on:

def demo():
    a = 1
    class B:
        x = a
    print(B.x)  # Okay.
    
    class C:
        x = a  # Fails.
        if False:
            a = None
    print(C.x)

If you run that, B.x is printed (1) but assigning to C.x fails:

>>> demo()
1
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
  File "<stdin>", line 7, in demo
  File "<stdin>", line 8, in C
NameError: name 'a' is not defined

The reason is that inside a function, assignment to a name makes it a local. This interacts oddly with class scope.

By the way, I get the same results with this all the way back to Python 2.4. (I don't have older versions to test.) So this has existed for a very long time.

[stevendaprano]

Looking at the disassembly of the demo() function also shows differences between the B and C classes.

I seem to recall discussion about this on, maybe, the Python-Dev list. I think resolving this will probably have to wait on a re-design of the exact scoping rules with respect to classes inside functions.